In lately release V2 version of UniBurma, I added extra faces. Right now, I got big feedback from internet users about that all font faces were smaller on internet browser printing. I've my point so far for modeling the font size a.k.a glyph size as this state. It can't be too big if the font meant for operating system use. But the internet browsing community tell the different story. Therefore for this purpose, I'm thinking for modeling web printing version which is basically bigger size than normal. Currently the project face naming use as the following naming standard:
UniBurma (production, main branch)
UniBurma_Regular (discontinued)
UniBurma_MSSerif (production)
UniBurma_SansSerif (production)
UniBurma_GGSerif (production)
UniBurma_FreeHand (still testing, derived version of CE_FreeHand)
I'll be thinking about adding upcoming fix release with extra face name UniBurma_Web or something for the purpose of web printing. The users have to explicitly declare the face name, which mean the face name UniBurma is different face name with all UniBurma_SomeThing.
Why UniBurma didn't focus on web version printing before?
Somehow, you can use Bit RFA or MyaZedi for this, thus this issue is not a major priority as a point of technical. Since Bit and MyaZedi have internal map collaboration, I guess, user can use UniBurma Keyboard Input with both fonts such as XKB, Window and Mac Keyboard.
To curious to test (like me) this, you can temporary take out bit-rfa font from your window system, then just left UniBurma inside your window computer and visit RFA Burmese homepage only with Firefox browser. You will see the face print out with UniBurma and observe the UniBurma smaller face instance. Seem from RFA burmese print css, they still enhanced the face size into 14 point.
Therefore, I was thinking to add-in bigger sizing in future for web purpose. At all cases, this is just designer preference and aspect. Anyway, I still want the community feedback for this issue regarding. So, please help here to discuss more about Burmese font character size and design concept. Reply in what you thoughts about and views, at least one of the following views.
.End User point Vs. Technical point Vs. Designer point
Reference Links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typeface
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glyph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_design
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typographic_unit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_typographic_units
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Em_(typography)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_(typography)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-height
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseline_(typography)
http://websitetips.com/typography/
http://websitetips.com/fonts/
